Everything that is done in the world is done by hope.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

63% of adults favor a law that would ban all advertisements of alcoholic beverages on billboards in the community.

Source: Center for Science in the Public Interest Alcohol Policies Project. Findings from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Survey, January 11, l999; 202-332-9110.

Preliminary research suggests that over 11 million children of alcoholics are under the age of 18.

Source: National Association for Children of Alcoholics, 11426 Rockville Pike, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20856; 301-468-0985
 

The rate of health care costs for children of alcoholics is 32% greater than children from non-alcoholic families.

Source: National Association for Children of Alcoholics, 11426 Rockville Pike, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852; 301-468-0985

  Read the History of the Federal Excise Tax, and efforts to reduce this by the Alcohol Lobby.


Example of letter sent in support of opposition to beer tax roll back to Senator Breaux


Find your
Senator/
Congressperson



 

 

Action Alert  National Alcohol Excise Tax

A bit about this topic:

-as much as I would like to write that this is about the emotional, and social ills so many of us see and know related to alcohol abuse and dependence, it is really about dollars and monetary cost related to alcohol consumption.

 

Alcohol, a legal drug, comes with great costs to the U.S.  Regardless of who is at fault, why it happens, and what reduces the impact on communities (Lots of good folks doing research on this to reduce the impact for those most at risk) we need to view the federal excise tax for what it is, "Fee for use".

  • You drink more, you pay in more taxes.  If you drink more, you cost our society more.
     

  • You drink moderately, you and pay taxes in moderation.

Equity for Alcohol Excise tax, is really about tax equity.  The alcohol lobby is very well entrenched and has worked hard for their industry.  In a nut shell the lobby does what it is paid to do.  They do an excellent job.  It is that simple.  Money, buys political power.  This industry is powerful, deep rooted, very well funded, and very skilled in their job to protect their industry, and further the revenues of the alcohol industry.

 

We should not expect the Alcohol industry to put the public's health ahead of their industries profits, that is not their job.

 

We however the tax payers, and voters of this country, living and raising families in communities across the country, are forced to deal with the consequences of this industries efforts to maximize profits for their shareholders, while we the tax payers get stuck with the bill for "costs to society & clean up".

 

Most adults have a choice to use this legal drug, we have a choice too.

If we choose not to spend our tax dollars already committed to other areas in need (schools, healthcare, highways, elderly etc) for the purposes of paying for "clean-up" efforts in society as a result of alcohol consumption.  The costs of Alcohol last year were more than $184 Billion dollars.

 

We must demand that those who choose to drink, also contribute to the costs alcohol consumption bring to our communities.  "Fee for use" is essentially what this excise tax amounts to.

Contact your Senator or Congressman

The information below will tell you how to contact those that work for you in D.C.  It is our job to send them our opinions on issues that they must vote on.  We need to let them know that we do not support taxpayers (who may or may not drink) being stuck with the expense of the costs alcohol consumption on the consequences, and show them support for choosing not to give this industry a "tax break" simply because they have enormous monies behind their lobby.  These people work for us.  The are our elected officials.

 

Example of letter sent in support of opposition to beer tax roll back to Senator Breaux  below is an example you can use, simply cut and paste into word document/WordPerfect document.

Write your letter today.  Get E-Mail, Fax and Snail mail address for LA congresspersons here

All other states go here

 

PLEASE OPPOSE ALCOHOL TAX CUTS!

 

 

VIA FAX:(202) XXX-XXXX


The Honorable (Senator / Representative)

U.S. Senate / House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20510 / 20515

 

Dear Senator / Representative ______:

 

I am writing to ask that you oppose any reductions in federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages, and decline co-sponsorship of bills promoted by the beer and liquor industries to substantially reduce excise taxes on those products (beer tax rollback bill H.R. 52, and any bill that may be introduced to reduce liquor taxes).  For the following reasons, such legislation is bad public health and fiscal policy:

  • The economic and social costs of drinking already far exceed alcohol tax revenues.  Federal tax revenues from alcoholic beverages totaled nearly $7.7 billion in 2001, while according to a government report the cost to society was estimated at $184 billion in 1998.  Now is not the time to sacrifice important revenues when the federal deficit is projected to soar to near record levels of $200 to $300 billion in the next two years.

  • Lowering taxes on alcoholic beverages will help stabilize or reduce prices, making those products more available to underage drinkers.  The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism has confirmed the link between alcohol prices and the quantity and frequency of youth drinking, as well as the link between prices and the rate of teen auto-crash fatalities.  Slashing taxes on alcoholic beverages – particularly beer – could lead to 600 more teen deaths per year in alcohol-related traffic crashes.

  • Despite an increase in 1991, alcohol taxes are low by historical standards.  Due to inflation, both the rates and revenues have dwindled dramatically over the past 50 years.  Adjusted for inflation, alcoholic beverages are actually at least 25% cheaper today than they were in 1951.

  • By wide margins, the American public supports increases – not decreases – in alcohol taxes.  That's because more than 35% don’t drink at all and among those who do, most drink so little that they would barely notice a tax decrease (or increase).  Alcohol tax cuts would benefit only producers and their heaviest drinking customers, the 20% of drinkers who consume 85% of the alcohol.  The vast majority of adult drinkers (75%) average just 5 drinks per week and account for only 13% of adult consumption.

  • Alcohol producers are prospering, and despite assertions that the tax cuts would benefit consumers, they have not hesitated to raise prices periodically to maximize profits.  They aren't concerned about ordinary consumers because they know that most of their revenue comes from the least price-sensitive heavy drinkers, who are either addicted or potentially in trouble with alcohol.

  • Please put the best interests of public health and safety and the young people of America ahead of alcohol companies' profits and the pocketbooks of their heavy-drinking best customers.  I hope you will reject all efforts to reduce federal taxes on alcoholic beverages and consider ways to increase them instead.  Thank you for your consideration and reply.

     

    Sincerely,

     

    Name/Contact Information

    Name and Address fax for Louisiana Congressional Delegation

     

     


    Copyright© 2003 HopeNet Inc., HopeNetworks Inc., all rights reserved.