Article in Baton Rouge Advocate:

"Punishment alone has never stopped alcoholism or addiction," said Michael Duffy, assistant secretary of the Office of Addictive Disorders in the Department of Health and Hospitals

 Thank you to all who have been writing the Governor---As of July 5, 2005 we ask that you
please continue with your letters.

We need your help to keep Louisiana's only Mandate for Treatment

Action Alert- Please Ask our Governor to Veto SB 157

Governor Blanco is reviewing SB 157 --She must hear from you if we are to save Treatment for 3rd and 4th DWI offenders. 
There is no reason for the Governor to sign this bill, and every reason for her to Veto it.  Governor Blanco has said publicly she wants to review the SB 157 and the related information prior to signing it.  We can help provide her with the information necessary to veto this anti-recovery legislation.

Please write/call her and give her information necessary for a decision that offers the greatest hope to all of Louisiana's residents, not just a few politically connected and powerful individuals who simply want to further punish everyone in our state by placing them at greater risk when individuals go without the vital services that address the root of their problem behaviors or sends them to prison for failure to do so.

National Directives by both Highway Safety and MADD National call for treatment mandates, Louisiana officials are willing to disregard what works--mandating substance abuse treatment for repeat offenders of our DWI laws.  Louisiana has to continue to make progress not go backwards, and SB 157 removes the "shall" get treatment to a "may" get treatment. 
The supporters of this bill know that means:
 those they don't believe "worthy" of treatment for this illness will be denied services and that is discriminatory and wrong.  Shall also mandates that the treatment beds be made available to those referred under current law.

Many of you have written asking how a few politically driven, well funded efforts could remove the treatment mandate proven to work, asking how in the worked SB 157 was passed.  We encourage you to share this with our Governor, along witht he information she needs if she were to VETO SB 157---She must hear from you if you Support Treatment/Recovery!
Please ACT TO SAVE THE ONLY TREATMENT PROVISION IN DWI CURRENT SENTENCING LAW ..........

Governor Blanco's Contact info:  Telephone Number: 1-(866) 366-1121 ----E-Mail http://www.gov.state.la.us/govemail.asp
via Fax  (225) 342-7099   website:  http://www.gov.state.la.us/govemail.asp

Contact Governor Blanco Ask her to VETO SB 157 to:

--Continue the proven effectiveness of mandating (requiring) treatment for 3rd and 4th offenders--to save Treatment and promote health and safety for all people.

--Validate our common goals to end the harms and deaths related as a result of impaired driving (Most of the deaths are of those actually impaired people most likely to need help to stop their behaviors and prevent needless deaths http://www.hopenetworks.org/DWI/Louisiana_Deaths_2003_DWI.htm  )

--Support the health and safety of all people in Louisiana by continuing the progression our current law passed by Rep. Odinet in 2001, and proven effective in finally removing impaired drivers off of the highways and keeping them off if they fail to remain clean and sober by then placing them in prison.

--Support the Treatment and Recovery efforts of thousands in our state---it is working and we must validate  this life saving/cost saving effective approach providing  treatment provisions, these provisions can't be removed without returning to the days of past, and continued systems proven NOT TO WORK.  Many of the repeat offenders we hear about today have not been sentenced under Odinet's law, if they had they would be either sober or in prison not on the roads.

--In June of 2005---EBR one individual had just left prison for an 11 year DWI sentence, only to get rearrested again shortly thereafter, he now is going face up to 50 years for being an alcoholic that is simply wrong, not to mention the cost of this failing of our sentencing laws,  it is expensive $35,000 to incarcerate vs. $3,500 to treat...we should continue to try to rehabilitate individuals we know have problems with alcohol/addiction earlier, not later, and support for what is proven to work should be our priority over moral beliefs that alcoholics are criminals rather than persons with a treatable illness.

--Validate that we should not support DWI sentencing guidelines are solely focused on punative (punishment is the priority)  approaches for sentencing, that comprehensive solutions are proven to work.  Currently courts have all discretion, however no standard exists statewide for appropriate state licensed substance abuse professionals to take part in an individuals recovery process.  In fact they play no role in clinical assessment, brief interventions, and help for problem drinkers is in no a way a priority in Louisiana sentencing laws, we want to change this, and will try every year to do so until we find success,  but for now we must keep the sole provision in place that is indeed working to reduce this costly problem.

--Not Broken --Current Treatment and Recovery Mandate provisions work, and National Advocacy groups have state directives for such mandates as part of a comprehensive strategy to solve this problem.

************************************************************************************************
Supporters of this legislation falsely believe that Judges should have more discretion in sentencing drivers convicted of drunken driving a third or fourth time, lawmakers said Friday, reversing a statute enacted five years ago mandating treatment over jail time (from Times Picayune)

Data driven decisions are important to save dollars and lives--more than 65% of those who have gotten help since treatment was mandated in 2001 according to Louisiana Office of Addictive Disorders (OAD) data,  remain clean and sober.  Those who did not remain sober now are in prison --so it is working. 
 
There is no valid data supporting a decision to sign SB 157
 
Unrealistic Claims by those Supporting this Legislation:
 

Judges are not qualified to make clinical/medical decisions as to the need for substance abuse treatment for individuals, and should not be expected of them.  The mandate requires that the obvious need for help is not going to be swept away(as we see done on 1st and 2nd offenses), reasoned away, or denied do to moral beliefs about a persons behavior that are the direct result of their illness going untreated.
 

*********************************************************************************************************************

 The discretion shown for helping alcoholics and addicts is often met with a lack of services (without the mandate) or lack of clinical skill set by those in an overcrowded judicial system.
 
Efforts to ensure that addicts/alcoholics get help needed from state licensed professionals in the  treatment/recovery support field has been ignored, overcrowded prisons, and a revolving door for "offenders" is obvious in our state, studies by our Office for Addictive Disorders reflect that 77% of those incarcerated are there as a result of their substance abuse issues.  There are no statewide standards for treatment in our prisons today.
 
We have seen our current law work to remove impaired people off of the highway, requiring them to participate in treatment/recovery programs and remain clean and sober or go to prison and serve long harsh sentences, this is a start, in fixing our entire system in need of total reform, and only when the appropriate screening and assessments, intervention, referral process is in place can we look at removing the sole treatment mandate in our law, to do so now, is to ignore the facts and data of successful outcomes meeting our common goals in removing impaired people from the highway.
 
***************************************************************************************************************
National Directives by both Highway Safety and MADD National call for treatment mandates.  Louisiana has to continue to make progress not go backwards, and SB 157 removes the "shall" get treatment to a "may" get treatment.  The authors of this bill know that means those they don't believe "worthy" of treatment for this illness will be denied services and that is discriminatory and wrong.  Further, it is important to realize that we are now expanding our request to judges to do what they are unqualified to do, to make decisions on who goes to treatment and who goes to jail.
 
Punitive only sentencing that saturates our current DWI sentencing laws have been proven not to work, the deaths and injuries continue and so do the fees/fines/gadgets, the one missing critical element, appropriate efforts to find and treat alcohol problems.
 
We do have mandates in sentencing across the board for the punitive provisions, it is very odd that those supporting this legislation oppose "mandates" but only for what is needed and proven to work in addressing repeat offenders, they fought for mandates that raise revenues and jailtime  currently in place but want the sole mandate for treatment removed.
 
 
On behalf of those who have taken time to carry a voice to the legislature by showing up and working tirelessly to educate lawmakers about the success of treatment and recovery support we now ask you to help with our efforts to inform Governor Blanco and  encourage her Veto SB 157, and know that in our next full session we will begin the process of bringing all people together for real reform in our 2006 legislative session.
 
Links in support of DWI Recovery Provisions:

More information on SB 157

Samantha-Hope Atkins
Executive Director, Founder
www.HopeNetworks.org
225-806-8552

Hope is passion for what is possible.
-- Soren Kierkegaard