|

2005
Legislative Bill List
|
If House Bill 754 becomes law, the 6,000 convenience and grocery
stores licensed to sell beer and liquor in Louisiana will also be
allowed to sell mixed drinks. The bill has already made it through
the House Judiciary Committee by a lopsided 8-4 vote. It could be
passed by the full House next week.
State Rep. Troy Hebert, D-Jeanerette, is sponsoring it. State
Commissioner of Alcohol and Tobacco Murphy Painter told the
committee that, in a state with abysmal alcohol safety records, the
proposal would further erode liquor laws
Today we need more alcohol help---not more alcohol problems
Alcohol
Outlet Facts
---More Alcohol..More Problems... |
|
-
“Wetter”
neighborhoods have higher levels of drinking, accidents, and violence.
Scribner, Richard: Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research,
February 2000.
|
-
There is a 15-16%
difference in individuals’ drinking attitudes and 11% difference in
individuals’ alcohol consumption attributable to density of alcohol
outlets in their neighborhoods (ibid)
|
-
The number of
alcohol outlets is related to violent assaults. A study done in 1995 in
Los Angeles showed that each additional alcohol outlet was associated
with 3.4 additional assaults per year.
Scribner, R., Mackinnon, D. & Dwyer, J.: “The risk of assaultive
violence and alcohol availability in Los Angeles County.” American
Journal of Public Health (85) 3: 335-340. 1995.
|
|
Alcohol outlet
density in Newark, N.J. was the single most important environmental
factor explaining why violent crime rates are higher in certain areas of
the city than in others. Alcohol outlet density was much more important
in determining crime rates than other factors, including employment rate
and median household income.
LaBouvie, E. & Ontkush, M.:”Violent crime and alcohol availability:
relationships in an urban community.” Journal of Public Health Policy
19(3):303-318. 1998.
|
|
According to a study
done in Los Angeles, there is a greater number of alcohol-related injury
crashes in cities with higher outlet densities. A 1% increase in outlet
density means a .54% increase in alcohol-related crashed. Thus, a city
of 50,000 residents with 100 alcohol outlets would experience an
additional 2.7 crashes for each new outlet opened.
Scribner, R., Mackinnon, D. & Dwyer, J.: “Alcohol outlet density and
motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles County cities.” Journal of
Studies on Alcohol (44): 447-453, July 1994.
|
|
A study done in
Cleveland showed that blocks that have more bars have higher crime rates
for murder, rape, assault, robbery, burglary, grand theft and auto
theft. Adding one bar to a block would result in 3.38 crimes committed
on that block in a year. It would increase the risk of murder taking
place on that block by 5%, and increase the risk of having a violent
crime of any type by 17.6%. Authors postulate that increased bar
density changes the character and environment of the neighborhood and
the routine activities of those living or visiting that block.
Runcek, D. & Maier, P. “Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: linking the
theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘hot spots.’ “
Criminology (29) 4: 725-753. 1991.
|
|
The level of
drinking, drinking participation, and participation in binge drinking
are all significantly higher among all college students when a greater
number of outlets licensed to sell alcoholic beverages exist near
campus. This is particularly true for underage drinking.
Chaloupka, F. & Wechsler, H. “Binge drinking in college: the impact of
price, availability and alcohol control policies.” Contemporary
Economic Policy, vol xiv, October 1996.
|
|
Over-concentration
of alcohol outlets is part of neighborhood economic and social
disintegration. The area’s economic base loses its diversity and
becomes less attractive to both residents and potential retail
customers. The proliferation of alcohol outlets is thus both a symptom
of economic decline and a factor that worsens the decline.
Maxwell, A. & Immergluck, D. “Liquorlining: liquor store concentration
and community development in lower-income Cook County (IL)
neighborhoods.” Chicago IL: Woodstock Institute, 1997.
|
|
Studies have found
that the complaints about alcohol outlets most often reported to city
planners had to do with noise, traffic or loitering. Freedom from
unwanted interruptions in one’s house or place of business are
fundamental legal rights. A basic tenet of law is the right to the
“quiet enjoyment” of one’s own property.
Preventing Problems Related to Alcohol Availability: Environmental
Approaches.
U.S. DHHS Pub No. (SMA) 99-3298.
|
|
The distribution of
off-sale alcohol outlets in New Orleans is geographically related to
homicides. The study, conducted in 1994-95, showed that neighborhoods
with high densities of off-sale alcohol outlets also have high rates of
homicide even after controlling for race, unemployment, age structure
and social disintegration. A typical New Orleans census tract with two
off-sale outlets has a homicide rate that is 24% higher than a census
tract with one outlet.
Scribner, R. et al.: “Alcohol availability and homicide in New Orleans:
conceptual considerations for small area analysis of the effect of
alcohol outlet density.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol, May
1999.
|